Jean Hess

Artist Statement   

Resume      

          

Brief History
The larger of my works, roughly 40” square, have always involved many, many layers of resin and pigment over dense and detailed infrastructure. These layers are meant to suggest light shining through air or water, with flowers or other small evanescent things such as celestial forms floating on the surface. I used to begin by drawing maps of places important to me, and lists of place names from my own past, which formed an intricate web upon which I built layers of paint that gradually obscured the details.  Now these larger paintings often include underlying grids that cite places upon which I superimpose hundreds of circles, cut from the old books as well as contemporary magazines, arranged in such a way that they look like floating planets receding into space. 

The final work looks like this:
I’ve been using very old school text books [turn of the 20th Century or earlier] in my work for some time now.  I started out clipping old maps and illustrations from the books for collages.  I combined these archival ephemera with various materials -- old wallpaper, mica, birch bark, flowers and leaves, metal leaf, and documents such as letters and stamps – with my own fairly realistic landscapes that were meant to signify a particular place and time.  The small landscapes, when most successful, seemed almost imaginary or other-worldly because I was applying layers of resin and pigment over them as I always have done in my work.  But since I was “framing” these images with the archival materials, rather than focusing on the materials for their own sake, I moved away from these early, rather formal painted collages.

At this point I began to create intricately gridded surfaces with small square fragments of the materials I had been using more formally.  I found it dazzling to de-construct and randomly rearrange a combination of things – the old books, the mica and metals, the bark and flowers.  These small pieces were a major departure into complete abstraction.  I could mix together maps and images from disparate parts of the globe, thus collapsing space; by fragmenting and recombining old detritus I could collapse time.  I also liked the rather painstaking process – it seemed to be a form of homage.

 

I soon became more intrigued by, and attached to, the little marks and notes children made in these old books, as well as the inadvertent ink blots, food and drink stains, pressed flowers and just overall wear and tear as the books got used.  I think in many cases books made their way into the hands of many children over the years – so the books were not permanently owned by a child, just “visited” for a time.  But long enough to leave marks or traces, which I found eminently worth preserving.  Once I focused on the children – the previous owners or readers of the books – all else paled by comparison.  It moved the preoccupation from the general – old printed material – to the specific – one volume marked by a real child who I lived so long ago that they are undoubtedly dead now. Over the years my own work has evolved in direct response to the children’s traces.  I started out by cutting all marks into uniform ½ inch squares and arranging them randomly in a rich abstract grid.  These early pieces nonetheless contained still-recognizable elements that I began to treasure – curlicue initials, coin rubbings, little sketches of people and animals.

 

I then reached a point when I could no longer cut into a complete image – there were too many worth preserving in their entirety.  That’s when I began to build paintings upon the documents kept whole.  The layers of resin and paint that I added over the original documents gave them a kind of hazy or other-worldly feel – as though viewed through the mists of time and memory.  I then felt I had hit upon the key to continuing.  I was able to combine my personal aesthetic – layers of atmosphere that allowed light to glimmer through while also revealing some of the original children’s documents.  Atop the last layer I add what I think of as “gifts” to the children –  to date mostly floating flowers, small ribbons or toys.  

Finally, a series I have only just begun involves leaving “gifts” of pure colored forms on whole pages or covers of the old books.  These are the most minimal things I have done to date, and I have no idea where they are going. They showcase what the child has written or drawn; my additions are incidental.  The pages themselves are not preserved in layers of resin, as in my other work – they are fragile and need to be displayed in Riker mounts, like specimens.

Where I Am Today

My process is to lose myself, literally, in my work.  That is to say, I try to let ideas flow [or tumble] to me, and I try not to determine outcomes.  I focus on what is already there, particularly the found, the random and the mundane.  The issue of old things, however – what used to be here but has now disappeared – serves only as a counterpoint. It is a reminder that one thing is no more, or less, important than another.  If a viewer perceives some element of memory or nostalgia, or longing, or loss, I can acknowledge that, but if I were in truth honoring my own personal memories and nostalgic issues I would do the work very differently. Or I would not do it at all.  I myself feel as though I am shrinking – disappearing – and that means many things; losing myself in the work itself, and also shedding any sense of self-importance.

The paintings have gotten progressively smaller in scale, and briefer in message to the point of possibly lacking meaning at all.  I would like to think that they hint at meaning while also eluding interpretation.   Any attempt at a grand gesture, at this point, would not express how I feel or how I would objectively rate my own importance in the scheme of things.  I feel disconnected from the image of de Kooning, for example, cutting large painterly swaths across a huge canvas.  I can offer a form of homage by engaging in repetition and futile, labor-intensive tasks. And as long as the end result signifies nothing more than an objective record or trace of the activity, I am satisfied.  That is why I try to preserve little sketches and markings or graffiti of children who lived in another century.  And that is why the flowers, ribbons, toys, animals and other carefully rendered signifiers are my own gifts to the children – the equivalent of flowers placed in homage at a sacred site.  The lives of these children are as significant, as worthy of preservation, as anyone’s, and my life is just as meaningfully engaged in preservation of the work of others as it is in creating work all my own.   If my work is a statement about myself, then it is a record of my own insignificance and eventual disappearance.  If contemplating reduction to nothingness is the sublime, then so be it.

Jean Hess         Knoxville       July 3, 2007

back to top of page